Why might a judge implement an injunction?

A judge might implement an injunction primarily to prevent a party from causing harm or taking specific actions that could lead to further complications or damages in a case. An injunction serves as a legal order that requires an individual or entity to do, or refrain from doing, a particular act. This tool is often used in situations where monetary damages would be insufficient to resolve the harm or where immediate intervention is necessary to maintain the status quo or protect the rights of the parties involved.

For instance, in cases involving property disputes, a judge might issue an injunction to stop a party from entering or modifying a property until the matter is resolved in court. This type of preventive action is critical in ensuring that neither party suffers irreparable harm while awaiting a final resolution of the underlying issues in the case.

Other options, while related to judicial processes, do not focus on the preventable nature of an injunction. Some may address different aspects of legal proceedings but do not apply directly to the fundamental purpose of an injunction, which is to halt potential or ongoing harm.